Glossary

Core technology

Acoustic cleaning vs ultrasonic cleaning

Also known as sonic cleaning vs ultrasonic cleaning, acoustic vs ultrasonic cleaning.

Acoustic cleaning and ultrasonic cleaning are routinely confused because both use sound to remove unwanted material. In every practical respect — frequency, medium, scale, target, mechanism — they are different technologies for different jobs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeAcoustic cleaningUltrasonic cleaning
Frequency band12–450 Hz (audible / infrasonic)20 kHz–400 kHz (ultrasonic)
Transmission mediumAir or flue gasLiquid bath (water + detergent or solvent)
Cleaning mechanismAcoustic vibration dislodges loose particulateCavitation — imploding microbubbles scrub surfaces
ModeIn situ, online, continuousOff-line, immersion of removed part
Scale of targetIndustrial vessels: boilers, ESPs, baghouses, silosSmall parts: jewellery, surgical instruments, electronics, machined components
Typical equipmentSonic horn, infrasonic cleaner, acoustic cleaning systemUltrasonic tank, transducer plate, generator
Power level140–180 dB acoustic SPL25–500 W per litre of bath
SectorPower, cement, pulp & paper, WtE, refining, miningMedical, dental, jewellery, optics, electronics manufacturing

What they share

Only the broad principle that mechanical vibration can dislodge bonded matter without abrasive contact. The wavelengths, equipment, target sizes and economics overlap nowhere.

Why the confusion exists

Both technologies are sometimes labelled "sonic cleaning" in informal usage, and both rely on the language of acoustics. Search-engine results for sonic cleaning mix the two indiscriminately. A specifier looking to clean a hopper, a baghouse or a boiler should follow the acoustic cleaning family of terms; a specifier looking to clean a printed circuit board, a watch movement or a surgical instrument should follow ultrasonic cleaning.

Related terms

Sources